Latest News

Recent Posts

Pennsylvania Residents Protest Romanian Immigrants ‘Defecating and Killing Chickens’ in Public

by JEROME HUDSON/Breitbart News Network A group of reportedly undocumented Romanian immigrants have caused controversy for residents in a Pennsylvania town, who ...

Read More

From the Lehigh Valley Project 9/12 Tea Party

  Have You Had Enough of the anti-Trump GOP Establishment Yet?   It’s time to fight back.   The GOP establishment is in lockstep with ...

Read More

Surprise! New Study Shows 92% of Liberal Activists Still Live with Their Parents

Written by Keely Sharp/ EagleRising.com I say “surprise” with very much sarcasm. A new report confirms exactly what we already believed to be ...

Read More

Social Security Trust Funds to Be Depleted in 17 Years

In 2022, cost of program will begin to exceed revenue Social Security Administration Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill / Getty Images BY: Ali Meyer / the ...

Read More

Joe Donnelly Increased Investment in Family Business After Shift to Mexican Labor

Indiana Democrat, an outsourcing critic, has seen greater earnings in recent years Sen. Joe Donnelly / Getty Images BY: Brent Scher  /the Washington ...

Read More

The One Sentence That Explains Washington Dysfunction

Column: The political class never expected Donald Trump to become president Donald Trump gives his acceptance speech at his election night ...

Read More

The Lehigh Valley Project 9/12 Tea Party Second Amendment Committee's News Letter

    Lehigh Valley Project 9/12 Tea Party Second Amendment Committee News Letter     2A Newsletter   Pennsylvania court sides with man in 4-year fight for ...

Read More

Cop Deaths Skyrocket 30%

BY KATRINA/Conservative Tribune   The constant negative narrative against American police officers in mainstream media and the rise of the Black Lives Matter ...

Read More

NRA's Colion Noir Has One Heck of a Message for Black Lives Matter

LVC Editors Note;  please be sure to view Colion's video at the end of this article. By Erika Haas at Townhall | Dana Loesch had ...

Read More

Six Facts On Gun Control That Prove Liberals Are Totally Wrong

By Matt | Contributor/Political Insider If you want to learn something about guns, don’t turn to a politician or media commentator. It’s hard not ...

Read More

Lehigh Valley 9/12 Project Tea Party, Second Amendment Committee Newsletter

Share

 

 

Two Pa. Men At Center Of U.S. Supreme Court Gun Rights Ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court recently dealt a blow to gun confiscation advocates by opening the door for some people, convicted of non-violent crimes, to challenge a federal ban on their ownership of firearms.

The case involved two Pennsylvania men who were convicted of non-violent crimes who successfully challenged the ban in the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, according to a report posted on U.S. News & World Report’s website. The U.S. Supreme Court justices let stand the lower court’s ruling that uniformly denying felons—at least those whose crimes were not serious—the right to own guns violated the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment, which protects the right to “keep and bear arms,” according to the article at www.usnews.com.

The Trump administration had appealed last year’s ruling, calling the 3rd Circuit Court ruling a threat to public safety. The 3rd Circuit ruling does not set a nationwide legal precedent.

The Pennsylvania men who challenged the ban, Julio Suarez of Gettysburg and Daniel Binderup of Manheim, both were convicted of non-violent misdemeanors. But the crimes carried maximum possible sentences of more than two years, falling within the definition of felony in the federal gun ban, even though neither one served jail time.

Federal law generally prohibits firearm possession by individuals convicted of a crime punishable by a year or more in jail, the traditional definition of a felony. However, the law does not apply to offenses labeled as misdemeanors under state law that carry jail time of two years or less.

Binderup, who owns a plumbing business, pleaded guilty in 1998 of corrupting a minor after having a sexual affair with a 17-year-old female employee according to the article. Binderup was sentenced to three years of probation.

Suarez was convicted in Maryland in 1990 of carrying a gun without a permit. He was given a suspended jail sentence and a year of probation.

In 2013 and 2014, the men separately sued to escape the felon gun-possession prohibition. Emphasizing their non-violent offenses and light sentences, they argued the law violates their right to keep and bear arms under the U.S. Constitution’s Second Amendment.

The Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in an 8-7 decision, held that people may challenge the ban depending on their particular criminal conviction, and found that it was unconstitutional as applied to the two men.

Although President Trump has strongly embraced the National Rifle Association, his administration in this case was on the same side as anti-gun advocates, including the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

The administration said in court papers the appeals court ruling would force judges to make case-by-case assessments of the risks possession by convicted felons, a job for which they are ill-suited. The administration added that too many felons whose gun ownership rights were restored for various reasons have gone on to commit violent crimes.

https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2017-06-26/us-top-court-rejects-appeal-of-felon-gun-ownership-ruling

In Separate Decision, Supreme Court Turns Down High Profile Gun Rights Case

In a case with national implications, the U.S. Supreme Court recently declined to review a California law that places severe restrictions on gun-owner rights.

At issue was concealed carry, and whether a county can define “good cause” to carry a weapon outside of one’s home as strictly as San Diego and other California counties, according to a foxnews.com article. A three-judge panel on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 in 2014 that the policy violated the right to self-defense, but 11 judges in the same circuit later ruled 7-4 in a new hearing that the restrictions were permissible.

The nation’s highest court rejected a review of the case, Peruta v. California, where gun rights activists argued that a “good cause” requirement on concealed carry permits is too restrictive. A “good cause” reason must be more specific than just a general concern for wellbeing. Instead a person must list a precise fear, such as domestic violence or carrying a large amount of money.

Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch said the court should have reviewed the appellate ruling. Thomas said the decision not to hear the case “reflects a distressing trend: the treatment of the Second Amendment as a disfavored right.”

The high court decided in 2008 that the Constitution guarantees the right to a gun, at least for self-defense at home.

But the justices have refused repeated pleas to spell out the extent of gun rights in the United States, allowing permit restrictions and assault weapons bans to remain in effect in some cities and states, although more than 40 states, including Pennsylvania, already broadly allow gun owners to be armed in public.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/26/us-supreme-court-declines-to-take-up-2nd-amendment-case-look-at-california-law.html

Pa. Moves Closer to Arming Teachers

Following a series of Islamic and other terror attacks, the Pennsylvania State Senate recently passed a proposal that would let teachers bring their guns to school. In a 28-22 vote, the GOP-controlled Senate approved Senate Bill 383 , which would allow school boards to authorize teachers and other non-police school employees to carry firearms on school property.

The bill’s primary sponsor, Sen. Don White, R-Indiana, championed the measure as a way to provide an extra tool for cash-strapped schools that can’t afford to hire more school police or resource officers. He stressed it was a “may” bill — meaning districts won’t be forced to do it — and characterized the proposed legislation as an example of “local control at its best,” according to an article on triblive.com.

“Certainly, we can pass the bill and none of the school districts in the commonwealth will implement it, and to me, that’s OK,” White told fellow lawmakers before the vote on the Senate floor. “However, my suspicion is that some school districts will exercise this option, particularly those in rural Pennsylvania that rely on state police for protection.”

SB 383 now advances to the state House for consideration, where Gov. Wolf, a Democrat, already has voiced strong opposition to the bill and vowed to veto it.

SB 383 co-sponsor Sen. Randy Vulakovich, R-Shaler, told parents at a meeting in Fox Chapel Area School District in April that he’s a “big believer that school districts can make this decision on their own.”

The measure was amended twice before passage — once to strengthen training and mental health evaluation requirements for educators who want to carry guns, and once to ensure that information about school employees authorized to carry guns would be exempt from public records requests via the state’s Right-to-Know Law.

Some observers in the pro-gun community are concerned about protecting the privacy of school staff who choose to carry while working. One of the provisions mandates that districts provide law enforcement with a list of names identifying armed staff members at each school, according to a guns.com report.

There’s no directives on how to protect that information, however, before, during or after its disclosure — and that’s a big problem for gun rights attorney, the article quotes Joshua Prince—of Prince Law Offices—as saying. “I fully support having armed school personnel in our schools,” he said in an April blog post. “However, this bill suffers from many issues that appear to have never been considered.”

Pennsylvania’s 501 school districts are spread across more than 2,500 municipalities, two-thirds of which rely on state police coverage. Some rural school districts encompass hundreds of square miles, leading to delayed response times, according to bill sponsor Republican Sen. Don White, the article notes.

“There are thousands of armed teachers and administrators in schools across the country and there has never been an incident where they have shot the wrong person, had their weapons taken by a student, or used a weapon inappropriately,” he said.

Prince told Guns.com that the bill requires school employees to possess a license to carry a firearm before the district allows them to do so at work. Although the identifying information of license holders “is confidential and not subject to disclosure,” per state law, Prince still had some concerns.

“Who is entitled within the school district to see and have access to this information?” he asks, according to the guns.com report. “Are logs to be kept of who views it and when? Is any training on the confidentiality of LTCF applicant information to be provided to school officials who have access to this information? If so, how frequently? Are logs to be kept of their training? These are all important issues that are not addressed, in any form, by the bill.”

http://triblive.com/news/education/12452072-74/pennsylvania-senate-advances-bill-to-let-teachers-bring-guns-to-school

PA bill to arm teachers raises doubts in pro-gun community

#####

Featured Video

Local Issues

Voices of the People

Your Schools

Issues

Letters to the Editor

More from our archives