Recent Posts

A million dollars a minute

Faucet Money Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times more >     By Andrew P. Napolitano - -from the Washington Times ANALYSIS/OPINION: Imagine ...

Read More

Warnings from the Founding Fathers on our reckless national spending and debt

  By Jerry Newcombe at Renew America U. S. Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky is beginning to sound like a lone ...

Read More

Liberals Fail, Volume XXXVII

By Kurt Schlichter at Townhall   It’s been a sad week to be a liberal, again. Nothing seems to be going right for our ...

Read More

Democrats Are Arguing for Constitutional Right to a Tax Deduction. Here’s Why It’ll Fail.

Alden Abbott / @AldenAbbott1 / Amy Swearer / @AmySwearer / Gil Gatch / The Daily Signal Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh joined other Democratic attorneys general in suing ...

Read More

FDR's 'New Deal' Social Security Act just that

  By Rev. Austin Miles at Renew America Have you noticed that Social Security is now identified as an 'entitlement' like ...

Read More

Fwd: Let me get this straight...

If we get nuked, it'll be by missiles built with technology Bill Clinton gave to China for campaign cash, funded ...

Read More

If we are going to spend the money anyway, let's spend it to harden the electric grid from an EMP

By Printus LeBlanc at NetRight Daily and Americans for Limited Government Earlier this month, conservatives and budget hawks lost the fiscal ...

Read More

Federal Government Posts $49 Billion Surplus in January

By Matt | Contributor | THE POLITICAL INSIDER The U.S. government reported a $49 billion surplus in January. According to the Monthly Treasury Statement, that’s a bigger surplus ...

Read More

Trump Has a New Plan to Save Money on Food Stamps

Amber Randall / @ARAND1990 / The Daily Signal  A new Trump administration plan would take half of the money people get from the Supplemental ...

Read More

Let California Leave?

  Let California Leave the USA There has been much talk about California, that almost socialist state, voting to become a separate ...

Read More

Latest News

[smoothslider]

“Federal judge rules cross on Lehigh County seal is unconstitutional”

Share

Dear LVC Editor,

The judge is ignorant of the Constitution of the United States.  According to your article, the judge claimed the Lehigh County seal “violated the Establishment Clause, which forbids government from favoring one faith over others or prohibiting religious practice.”.  There is no such provision in the entire Constitution of the United States.  The Establishment Clause, found in Amendment I reads as follows:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …

Congress made no law regarding Lehigh County’s seal.  In fact, the federal government has no jurisdiction in this matter.  See Amendment X:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

The judge has violated two of the underlying principles of the Constitution:

  • Federalism – The court has failed to recognize it has no jurisdiction in this matter.  This is a matter for the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
  • Separation of Powers – The Constitution recognizes three branches of the federal government – legislative, executive and judicial.  The Establishment Clause limits Congress by prohibiting it from passing any law that might tend to establish a national religion.  But it also prevents Congress from passing a law to prevent the free exercise of religion.  Since there is no law passed by Congress prohibiting the exercise of religion in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the judge is unable to point to an applicable federal law.

No doubt the judge will fall back on case precedence, pointing to other cases in which it is claimed that the Establishment Clause applies to all “government”, not just Congress.  Unfortunately for the judge, he will find no source in the Constitution, in The Federalist or other credible source of interpreting the Constitution.  Thus the issue comes down to repeating a judicial error instead of understanding the Constitution the judge has sworn to support (see Article VI).  Prior cases may be consulted for guidance, but they do not trump the Constitution itself.

Phil Duffy

Instructor, Constitution of the United States

Regular Contributor, WFYL’s We the People – the Constitution Matters

 

Comments are closed.

Polls

What issues are most important to you in PENNSYLVANIA ONLY. Pick your top 3.

View Results