Recent Posts

Winning and keeping our victory for America depends on you voting

By Laurie Roth at Renew America We will win the House and the Senate and keep the Trump freedom ball rolling ...

Read More

In This Highly Divided Time, Americans Are United Over One Thing: Feinstein Blew It

                                        ...

Read More

Taxpayers to deliver 30,000 signed petitions to Governor Wolf--Press Release from the PA Liberty Alliance

Taxpayers to deliver over 30,000 signed petitions urging Gov. Wolf to support elimination of school property taxes on Tuesday   HARRISBURG – ...

Read More

Former Head Of ICE Tom Homan: Democrats Are To Blame For Illegal Immigrant Caravan

by Alicia F. Luke/Eagle Rising As a caravan of nearly 4,000 Honduran migrants makes its way to our southern U.S. border ...

Read More

The Financial Weight of Anchor Babies

The cost of children born to illegals puts in perspective the cost of building a border wall. By Nate Jackson · ...

Read More

Democrat Sen. Sherrod Brown Urges Amnesty for Illegals with Jobs

 Neil Munro/ Breitbart News Network The federal government should stop enforcing deportation laws against illegal migrants who have jobs, Ohio Democrat Sen. ...

Read More

Dems Hate GA Voter Law Because They Don’t Think Minorities Can Write Own Names: Hunter

  ShutterstockAn effort to crack down on potential voter fraud in Georgia is being criticized by Democratic groups as "voter suppression." ...

Read More

IT’S HAPPENING! McConnel is Working to Secure Funding!

IT’S HAPPENING! McConnel is Working to Secure Funding! BREAKING NEWS BY AMY MORENO /TruthFeed It’s happening! Congress is on board with funding President Trump’s border wall. House ...

Read More

REPORT: 2/3 of Births to Illegals Are Subsidized by Taxpayers

  Lionel Parrott /libertyheadlines ‘The large share who can’t provide for themselves without the help of American taxpayers raises serious questions…’ IMAGE: Stand With ...

Read More

California Admits DMV Error Added Noncitizens to Voter Rolls

Will Racke / @hwillracke / The Daily Signal California’s Department of Motor Vehicles says a “processing error” at agency field offices resulted in ...

Read More

Latest News

[smoothslider]

“Federal judge rules cross on Lehigh County seal is unconstitutional”

Share

Dear LVC Editor,

The judge is ignorant of the Constitution of the United States.  According to your article, the judge claimed the Lehigh County seal “violated the Establishment Clause, which forbids government from favoring one faith over others or prohibiting religious practice.”.  There is no such provision in the entire Constitution of the United States.  The Establishment Clause, found in Amendment I reads as follows:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; …

Congress made no law regarding Lehigh County’s seal.  In fact, the federal government has no jurisdiction in this matter.  See Amendment X:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

The judge has violated two of the underlying principles of the Constitution:

  • Federalism – The court has failed to recognize it has no jurisdiction in this matter.  This is a matter for the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
  • Separation of Powers – The Constitution recognizes three branches of the federal government – legislative, executive and judicial.  The Establishment Clause limits Congress by prohibiting it from passing any law that might tend to establish a national religion.  But it also prevents Congress from passing a law to prevent the free exercise of religion.  Since there is no law passed by Congress prohibiting the exercise of religion in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the judge is unable to point to an applicable federal law.

No doubt the judge will fall back on case precedence, pointing to other cases in which it is claimed that the Establishment Clause applies to all “government”, not just Congress.  Unfortunately for the judge, he will find no source in the Constitution, in The Federalist or other credible source of interpreting the Constitution.  Thus the issue comes down to repeating a judicial error instead of understanding the Constitution the judge has sworn to support (see Article VI).  Prior cases may be consulted for guidance, but they do not trump the Constitution itself.

Phil Duffy

Instructor, Constitution of the United States

Regular Contributor, WFYL’s We the People – the Constitution Matters

 

Comments are closed.

Polls

Please take our reader satisfaction poll. Please select one from each part.

View Results